<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>everyonedeletestom.com &#187; launch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://everyonedeletestom.com/index.php/category/launch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://everyonedeletestom.com</link>
	<description>Thinly disguised anti-fan page. Really the rantings of a UX practitioner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:02:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>News Limited Australia launch: The Punch</title>
		<link>http://everyonedeletestom.com/index.php/2009/06/02/news-limited-australia-launch-the-punch/</link>
		<comments>http://everyonedeletestom.com/index.php/2009/06/02/news-limited-australia-launch-the-punch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 04:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>melissa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UGC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everyonedeletestom.com/index.php/2009/06/02/news-limited-australia-launch-the-punch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News Limited has launched a new site called &#8220;The Punch&#8221; aimed at news opinion and debate. Launched only two days ago this site already claims to be &#8220;Australia&#8217;s best conversation&#8221;. The Punch is primarily presented in a blog format which I always think is much more &#8216;new media&#8217; than the traditional online newspaper format which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News Limited has launched a new site called &#8220;<a href="http://www.thepunch.com.au/" title="The Punch">The Punch</a>&#8221; aimed at news opinion and debate. Launched only two days ago this site already claims to be &#8220;Australia&#8217;s best conversation&#8221;.</p>
<p>The Punch is primarily presented in a blog format which I always think is much more &#8216;new media&#8217; than the traditional online newspaper format which dictates what editors think you should be reading about, rather than what is just in, most viewed, or most commented on &#8211; all formats which lend to an event based or audience driven information hierarchy.</p>
<p>This effort has left me very curious about News Ltd&#8217;s broader strategy. They link to their competitors, twitter and even go as far as presenting some of their harshest critics in the &#8220;Sites We Like &#8211; our web survival guide.&#8221; Perhaps someone over there actually gets this web thing!?</p>
<p>Then sigh, I <a href="http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/a-pinch-and-a-punch-david-penberthy-punch-launch-article/" title="Punch launch article">read</a> they will be considering a subscription model down the track.</p>
<p>And I hear &#8211; they are not paying contributors. Ho hum. Could it be that big corp got sold on the idea that this awesome new media format could open up opportunities to advertise all over free contributions? Equaling low cost (hopefully), high profits (hopefully) and all off the backs of other people&#8217;s good will? This is the primary lash back or concern being talked about today &#8211; and rightly so.</p>
<p>So, what are the other traditional players doing? Hmmm&#8230;  Now, I know there are some really smart people at News, but I also know it is harder to get those agendas up the reporting lines. So, well done.</p>
<p>At any rate it&#8217;s very interesting that they have decided to build a more collaborate offering off their traditional platform, although I know not user groups will see News Ltd as a trustworthy source to such a service. So, what are people saying about it on <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=thepunch">twitter</a>?</p>
<p>What others are saying:<br />
<a href="http://importanceofideas.com/2009/06/02/punch-no-journalism-knockout/" target="_blank">Punch no Knockout for Journalism</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/01/crikey-counterpoint-two-verdicts-on-the-punch/">Crickey Counterpoint: two verdicts </a></p>
<p class="msg">         <a href="http://twitter.com/uxrob" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/exit/to/uxrob');" target="_blank">@uxrob</a>: <span id="msgtxt1985044903" class="msgtxt en">News launches <a href="http://www.thepunch.com.au/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/exit/link/1985044903')" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.<strong>thepunch</strong>.com.au/</a> &#8220;Australia&#8217;s best conversation&#8221;. Nice idea but feels like a flame war waiting to happen.</span></p>
<p class="msg"><span class="status-body"><span class="entry-content">@<a href="http://twitter.com/mpesce">mpesce</a> Quoth Crikey: Opinion is not journalism.&#8221; I call bullshit. Journalism has always been opinion. Sooner we face that, the better.</span></span></p>
<p class="msg">Totally agree &#8211; controversial launch&#8230;  I&#8217;m sure the debate will be hot and agendas will be transparent. I&#8217;m going to watch and read more. The idea is good, the murdoch aspect is one more agenda among many in this rapidly changing media landscape of survival during the death of print and the vocal control this industry once had. Another addition to conversation is always good by me&#8230;</p>
<p>Really keen to learn more about this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thepunch.com.au/" title="thepunch.com.au" target="_blank">http://www.thepunch.com.au/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://everyonedeletestom.com/index.php/2009/06/02/news-limited-australia-launch-the-punch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Faceted Search Launches</title>
		<link>http://everyonedeletestom.com/index.php/2009/03/02/domain-faceted-search-launches/</link>
		<comments>http://everyonedeletestom.com/index.php/2009/03/02/domain-faceted-search-launches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>melissa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[information architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everyonedeletestom.com/index.php/2009/03/02/domain-faceted-search-launches/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, the Information Architecture I did with Max for Domain&#8217;s new search facility has launched! This blog says its ok: but could be improved&#8230; Peter Ricci, does however, gather that it&#8217;s only a first phase roll out and that would be correct. I really like that he sparked a debate about the design and I&#8217;d [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, the Information Architecture I did with <a href="http://www.twitter.com/maxsoe" target="_blank">Max</a> for <a href="http://www.domain.com.au">Domain&#8217;s new search facility</a> has launched!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.business2.com.au/2009/03/02/domain-launches-a-new-search-that-works/">This blog</a> says its ok: but could be improved&#8230; Peter Ricci, does however, gather that it&#8217;s only a first phase roll out and that would be correct. I really like that he sparked a debate about the design and I&#8217;d have to agree on many fronts. It is a bit clunky but a step in the right direction.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written about <a href="http://everyonedeletestom.com/index.php/2008/08/22/faceted-navigation-possibilities-for-design/">faceted navigation on this blog</a> before, and designed the MyCareer implementation which influenced tweaks to the  <a href="http://www.drive.com.au">Drive</a> solution&#8230; so I became pretty experienced with the old faceted navigation pattern. I must say though, I think <a href="http://www.mycareer.com.au" target="_blank">MyCareer is the cleanest implementation</a>, although the need for multiple select with Domain proposed a more difficult design problem.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.domain.com.au"><img src="http://everyonedeletestom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/domain_search_new.jpg" alt="Domain Search Options" border="0" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://everyonedeletestom.com/index.php/2009/03/02/domain-faceted-search-launches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
