• Some really good points on why an iPad user says they prefer Safari over apps.
    http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2010/05/i-prefer-safari-to-content-apps-on-the-ipad.html

    What really resonated with me:
    - apps don’t talk to each other
    - social media doesn’t launch apps
    - the UI is different for every app so you need to work out how each works
    - yah, multitasking… no multiple tabs!
    - web content is still free

    Really makes me wonder about the volume of trade in the ipad app store. The crucial differences between iphone apps and ipad apps are the display size of the device, the cost of apps, subscription (you keep paying) and the fact that it doesn’t really matter if media companies have worked out how to automatically redirect urls to an optimised experience… as it was in the old days with the iphone… if it is a half decent site to start with that is!

    Now, I know there are plenty of places and people and purposes for this. But my post is speaking generally. After all the business model should be about attracting as many consumers as possible. So how many is possible?

    I wonder if users are going to be paying more for premium products will it equal less variety per user? How thin will that dollar need to be spread out across the media landscape? Will people really be loyal to more than one paper and a few magazines? And that’s just the slither of the market who are interested in the short to medium term.

    At least this whole consumer fanaticism going on in the net world might distract the attentions of developers getting that one URL thing sorted and keep the iphone app industries pockets licked.

    Even so, there are free news apps on this device to compete with already. And in many cases they got to market first. Just like the real web. (real, ha!) So does it all come back to brands backed by plesant experiences? (note brands first and loyalty second… UX as insurance?)

    I guess what I’m really saying is that we should also be focused on making sure our current web properties perform well on these new devices as well as hopping on the app train. Just like you would support and test for any browser. Users already have two communications bills on the whole. One for our internet and the other for our phone.

    Sure, the app store is an amazing business model and a cash cow if you get it right, but is it as neccessary for users with a larger screen for sites with good web infrastructure? In a competitive market it is likely that someone else will get this right if you don’t.

  • scissors
  • So, as I become hopelessly addicted to podcasts, I have a desperate urge for the fix of sharing them with others. So, as promised to a few friends, here is a list of what I’ve been captured by recently, with more lists to come as I go.

    Oh, and please send your suggestions – I’m always on the look out.

    On The Media
    Website | iTunes
    For one hour a week, the show tries to lift the veil from the process of “making media,” especially news media, because it’s through that lens that we literally see the world and the world sees us. | Published: Monday’s EST time, WNYC, USA

    The Moth
    Website | iTunes
    Open mic unscripted story telling. Usually 15 – 20 minutes,  amazingly well told personal stories. | Published: Tuesday’s EST time, Non-for-profit, New York

    Future Tense
    Website | iTunes
    Exploring the social, cultural, political and economic fault lines arising from rapid change. | Aired: Thursday 8.30am repeated Friday 12.30am | Published: Thursday’s, Radio National, ABC

    Media Talk USA
    Website | iTunes
    Jeff Jarvis and a regular panel of media commentators analyse the latest developments in the US media and tech worlds. | Published: Monthly, The Guardian

    This American Life
    Website | iTunes
    This American Life exploring a different theme, every week by telling the stories of everyday people. | Published: Monday’s EST, Chicago Public Radio

  • scissors
  • Start with a number followed by a nifty subject area full of tips.

    Here are some useful examples:

    20 Fantastic Resources For User Experience Know How:
    http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/05/15/ux-madness-20-fantastic-resources-for-user-experience-know-how/

    50 iPhone Apps for Web Designers and Developers
    http://mac.appstorm.net/roundups/iphone-roundups/50-iphone-apps-for-web-designers-developers/

    20 Tools to Make the life of a Web Developer Easier
    http://net.tutsplus.com/articles/web-roundups/20-tools-to-make-the-life-of-a-web-developer-easier/

    25 Most Useful Blogs for web design and development
    http://www.webappers.com/2009/04/06/25-most-useful-blogs-for-web-design-development/

    50 Great Examples of Data Visualizations
    http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2009/06/50-great-examples-of-data-visualization/

    5 impressive Mashups of Twitter and Flickr
    http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-flickr-mashups/

    30 days to become a freelancer
    http://www.skelliewag.org/30-days-to-become-a-freelancer-961.htm

    Trend spotting a fashion that is beginning to get irritating.

  • scissors
  • News Limited has launched a new site called “The Punch” aimed at news opinion and debate. Launched only two days ago this site already claims to be “Australia’s best conversation”.

    The Punch is primarily presented in a blog format which I always think is much more ‘new media’ than the traditional online newspaper format which dictates what editors think you should be reading about, rather than what is just in, most viewed, or most commented on – all formats which lend to an event based or audience driven information hierarchy.

    This effort has left me very curious about News Ltd’s broader strategy. They link to their competitors, twitter and even go as far as presenting some of their harshest critics in the “Sites We Like – our web survival guide.” Perhaps someone over there actually gets this web thing!?

    Then sigh, I read they will be considering a subscription model down the track.

    And I hear – they are not paying contributors. Ho hum. Could it be that big corp got sold on the idea that this awesome new media format could open up opportunities to advertise all over free contributions? Equaling low cost (hopefully), high profits (hopefully) and all off the backs of other people’s good will? This is the primary lash back or concern being talked about today – and rightly so.

    So, what are the other traditional players doing? Hmmm…  Now, I know there are some really smart people at News, but I also know it is harder to get those agendas up the reporting lines. So, well done.

    At any rate it’s very interesting that they have decided to build a more collaborate offering off their traditional platform, although I know not user groups will see News Ltd as a trustworthy source to such a service. So, what are people saying about it on twitter?

    What others are saying:
    Punch no Knockout for Journalism

    Crickey Counterpoint: two verdicts

    @uxrob: News launches http://www.thepunch.com.au/ “Australia’s best conversation”. Nice idea but feels like a flame war waiting to happen.

    @mpesce Quoth Crikey: Opinion is not journalism.” I call bullshit. Journalism has always been opinion. Sooner we face that, the better.

    Totally agree – controversial launch…  I’m sure the debate will be hot and agendas will be transparent. I’m going to watch and read more. The idea is good, the murdoch aspect is one more agenda among many in this rapidly changing media landscape of survival during the death of print and the vocal control this industry once had. Another addition to conversation is always good by me…

    Really keen to learn more about this:

    http://www.thepunch.com.au/

  • scissors
  • Meg Pickard, Head of Communities & User Experience – The Guardian (London)

    There are many ways for users to consume content online, begins Pickard. They consume, react, curate and create. Unfortunately we spend most of our time and efforts engaging them to consume and not enough engaging users to react, curate or create.

    Meg Pickard Speaking at Media 09

    UCG or user generated content is considered a pretty dry term by Meg, she’d prefer to think of it as users expressing themselves about stuff they are passionate about.

    People also tend to get social media and social networking confused. To often the media tends to provide social media tools in a separate environment to the content, rather than having that engagement interacting with the content.

    Read the rest of this entry »

  • scissors
  • Carolyn Little, Guardian News and Media North America at Media O9

    Now is the age of free. People expect not to pay.

    Newspapers need to do more than repackage their content for online purposes. Read the rest of this entry »

  • scissors
  • A little humor pre serious reading… http://www.flickr.com/photos/arbernaut/2476955162/in/set-72157604470275439/

    Check out:

  • scissors
  • It doesn’t surprise me that audience consumption & the direction of / role that media plays in democracy makes a key point in Al Gore’s Assault on Reason. It seems as though Al’s personal accounts of the effect of media on democracy will deliver impact. Interestingly, Al appears to favor interactive media for its ability to provide platforms for participation and makes calls for the www to remain open.

    Calling for an open web – I wonder what Al thinks of Google & if he in fact uses it at all.

     http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1622015,00.html

  • scissors